Blog

Benchmark testing of Raspberry Pi operating systems

The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the Raspberry Pi Foundation to promote studying basic computer science at schools. Raspberry Pi was first introduced as a prototype in late 2011 as a tool to teach and learn programming.
16 September 2014
Quality assurance
Article by a1qa
a1qa

The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the Raspberry Pi Foundation to promote studying basic computer science at schools. Raspberry Pi was first introduced as a prototype in late 2011 as a tool to teach and learn programming.

Most buyers, once they get their hands on the new RPi, follow the getting started instructions on the Raspberry Pi site running recommended Raspbian proprietary OS. Kano OS is a fork of Raspbian OS, a Debian Linux Distro. It’s an operating system designed for simplicity, speed, and code learning, targeted at new Raspberry Pi users. It dynamically adjusts the Raspberry Pi’s clock-speed when load reaches 100.

Still, there’s a wealth of other operating systems available on the market. But the more alternatives, the harder to choose. Thus, the preferences should be defined and then compared. QA consulting comes to help with this – below, we provide our benchmark on the three operating systems for Raspberry Pi based on our comprehensive testing.

How the benchmark was performed

We selected three Operating Systems Raspbian OS, KANO OS, Pidora OS and conducted different benchmark tests to define how performance characteristics of these operating systems varied.

21 different tests were run, and the results were compared and analysed based on the benchmarks` characteristics.

The following characteristics or measurements were considered:

  • Each test was launched in the same system state.
  • No other functions or applications were active in the system unless the scenario included some activity running in the system.
  • Launched applications used memory even when they were minimized or idle, which could increase probability of garbling the results.
  • The hardware and software used for benchmarking match the production environment.
  • Three identical boards were used with Kano OS Beta 1.0,2 , Pidora 2014 (Raspberry Pi Fedora Remix, version 20) and Raspbian Debian Wheezy (version January 2014) operating systems, installed on SD cards.
  • Benchmarks were launched via commands in Terminal, where real-time activities and results were displayed.

Benchmarks used

Below is a list of all Benchmarks used and the information on successful or failed launch.

Final OS benchmark score

Not all operating systems had success in launching some of the benchmarks and several benchmarks were not objective (PSTree, Top, HardInfo, sysv-rc-conf), so the score can be considered an approximate one.

Overall, Kano OS outperformed Pidora OS and Raspbian OS.
The measurements are approximate and are not 100% scientifically correct. Still, we intended to get a rough idea of how the systems perform. The performance benchmarks and the values shown here were received using particular well-configured and carefully installed systems. All performance benchmark values are provided “AS IS” and no warranties or guarantees are given or implied by a1qa. Actual system performance may vary and is dependent upon many factors including system hardware configuration, software design, and configuration.

Full report with test results data and benchmarks descriptions can be provided upon your request.

More Posts

Why do bugs get missed
27 September 2024,
by a1qa
7 min read
Why do bugs get missed? Learn the problems and tips to avoid them
Still, finding overlooked bugs after the app goes live? Let’s find out why this happens and how to fix it.
Performance testing
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Test automation
Soft skills 101
13 September 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Soft skills 101: how to supercharge business success in 2025
Discover the value of soft skills for both career development and workplace improvement and learn some tips to sharpen them.
General
Quality assurance
QA to ensure smooth migration to the cloud
15 August 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
QA to ensure smooth migration to the cloud
Learn how effectively migrate to the cloud by implementing QA activities.
Functional testing
General
Migration testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Test automation
Load testing
23 July 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
7 reasons why businesses need load testing 
Want to optimize software performance or ensure its smooth functioning during peak sales season? Discover how load testing may help.
Quality assurance
Test automation
27 June 2024,
by a1qa
3 min read
Establishing seamless interaction between development and QA teams to boost productivity
Establishing seamless interaction between development and QA teams to boost productivity
Agile
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
17 June 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Shifting to test automation to maximize software quality
Explore in the article why businesses should move from manual testing to test automation.
Quality assurance
Test automation
RPA in QA
28 May 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Embracing robotic process automation to drive efficiency in QA
Discover how the convergence of robotic process automation helps reshape software testing practices.
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
QA for fintech
7 May 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Navigating the fintech frontier in 2024: QA’s role in delivering high-quality financial software 
Unveil the future of fintech innovations and learn to refine their quality with the help of software testing.
Blockchain app testing
Cybersecurity testing
Quality assurance
Shift-left testing for better software performance
25 April 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Optimizing software performance with shift-left testing
Still in doubt whether to include performance testing from the initial development stages? Learn the benefits companies obtain with shift-left performance testing.
Performance testing
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Test automation

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.