Blog

Evaluating the effectiveness of test automation

Test automation evaluation allows you to answer the following questions: "Should we use automation on the project?", "When will automation bring a significant result?", "How many hours of manual testing can be replaced?”
29 October 2015
Test automation
The article by a1qa
a1qa

In recent years, automated testing has become a trend in software development. However, it is labor-intensive and expensive to implement and maintain. That is why automated tests should be used only when it is really necessary.

What are the reasons for test automation?

The most common way to evaluate the effectiveness of test automation is to calculate the return on investment (ROI) that is the ratio of profit divided by expenses.

Saving efforts on manual testing can be a profit as well. The benefits of test automation may not be apparent, e.g. finding defects in ad-hoc testing by manual testers, who have much free time thanks to conducted test automation. This profit is quite difficult to realize, so you can make an assumption (e.g. 10%) or omit it.

However, test automation is not always implemented to save money or resources. The speed of testing can be significant for business for many reasons. Precisely in these cases, automation helps save not money but time.

Another reason is to avoid the human errors testing the systems that require extreme accuracy and correctness. The price of such errors can be significantly higher than the cost of automated tests development and maintenance.

When is test automation suitable?

Test automation is appropriate and can be implemented in the following cases:

  • The application functions smoothly
  • The functionality is tested regularly and frequently.

What are the initial data for effectiveness measuring?

To measure the effectiveness of test automation implementation the following input data is required:

  • The cost (in man-hours) of manual testing
  • Autotests development costs (in man-hours)
  • Information about the frequency of testing.

How is the effectiveness evaluated?

Usually, the time period for analysis is a month. But it can be changed according to the project needs. To begin with, calculate the cost of manual testing during each interval.

Then we estimate the cost of automated tests development. Also, it is crucial to take into account the team size. Analyze the difference between the cost of manual testing (without automation) and automated testing.

What can affect the effectiveness of test automation?

  • Frequency of test runs

Supposing that one test is run every day and requires 1 man-hour, the automation of the test takes 4 hours. It is obvious that on the fifth day, autotests will become more effective than manual testing.

  • Data-driven testing

Often one and the same test is needed to perform with a different set of input data or in different environments, e.g. cross-browser testing or creating a single entity with different data.

In this case, test automation with the use of the data-driven approach is the best solution.

  • Tester’s experience

A factor that greatly affects the cost of development is tester’s experience. The tester needs to have enough skills and knowledge to develop, maintain, and analyze automated tests. Otherwise, the time and cost of automation will increase.

  • Tools cost

There is a large number of different tools for test automation. Most of the paid applications are better than their free equivalents and allow developing and debugging tests faster.

  • Analysis and maintenance

While evaluating the effectiveness of test automation, most engineers forget about such important activities like the analysis and support of test runs. If there are a lot of autotests on the project, it may take a long time.

  • Cost of test suits preparation

Often, test automation engineers receive from manual testers test cases that are not suitable for automation. For this reason, sometimes it is necessary to prepare test suits from scratch.

It is obvious that test automation evaluation allows you to answer the following questions:

  • “Should we use automation on the project?”
  • “When will automation bring a significant result?”
  • “How many hours of manual testing can be replaced?”

However, even after receiving the answers to the above-mentioned questions, you should remember that automation can be introduced only when testing processes are stable.

More Posts

13 May 2021,
by a1qa
4 min read
How to attain in-sprint test automation to reinforce development processes
Learn how in-sprint test automation improves business workflows. Consider the top 5 essential steps to introduce it smoothly.
Test automation
12 April 2021,
by a1qa
5 min read
Watch out for 6 telecom trends and QA tips to implement them
In our article, we unleash the upcoming telecom trends and reveal how to be certain in introducing them correctly by applying QA practices.
Agile
Test automation
31 March 2021,
by a1qa
4 min read
QA scenario to introduce 6 eCommerce trends in 2021
Discover what trends will rule the eCommerce industry in 2021 and how QA can help implement them with confidence and ease.
Cybersecurity testing
Test automation
25 February 2021,
by a1qa
4 min read
9 QA points for delivering high-quality SaaS-based solutions
In the article, we’ve gathered 9 QA factors relying on the SaaS specifics that may help to perform SaaS testing with ease.
Cloud-based testing
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Test automation
29 January 2021,
by a1qa
4 min read
3 do’s and 3 don’ts in BFSI software testing
Considering BFSI to be a fast-paced industry, how to keep up with such velocity? We’ve prepared 3 do’s and 3 don’ts that help sustain the rush and high software quality.
Functional testing
Mobile app testing
Test automation
18 December 2020,
by a1qa
4 min read
Top 5 QA and software testing trends in 2021: responding to a global situation with ease
Rapidly approaching 2021, a1qa proposes to have a closer look at the most influential trends empowering QA teams to perform even more effectively.
Agile
QA trends
Test automation
30 November 2020,
by a1qa
5 min read
Acumatica: ensuring sound business operations with well-tested ERP system
Internal business activities are advancing, while ERP systems’ usage is growing rapidly. Explore how to ascertain their accurate work through timely applying QA.
Big data testing
Cybersecurity testing
ERP testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Test automation
13 November 2020,
by a1qa
5 min read
QA for media and entertainment
Read the article to explore why QA is a must for the media and entertainment sector and how to perform software testing effectively.
Functional testing
Mobile app testing
Performance testing
Test automation
Usability testing
28 October 2020,
by a1qa
5 min read
eHealth software testing: taking the digital Hippocratic oath
Medicine has broken new ground. However, there’s still no room for errors. Get to know more information about effective testing approach in the health sector. 
Big data testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Test automation

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.