Effectiveness of-test automation
Blog

Evaluating the effectiveness of test automation

Test automation evaluation allows you to answer the following questions: "Should we use automation on the project?", "When will automation bring a significant result?", "How many hours of manual testing can be replaced?”
29 October 2015
Test automation
The article by a1qa
a1qa

In recent years, automated testing has become a trend in software development. However, it is labor-intensive and expensive to implement and maintain. That is why automated tests should be used only when it is really necessary.

What are the reasons for test automation?

The most common way to evaluate the effectiveness of test automation is to calculate the return on investment (ROI) that is the ratio of profit divided by expenses.

Saving efforts on manual testing can be a profit as well. The benefits of test automation may not be apparent, e.g. finding defects in ad-hoc testing by manual testers, who have much free time thanks to conducted test automation. This profit is quite difficult to realize, so you can make an assumption (e.g. 10%) or omit it.

However, test automation is not always implemented to save money or resources. The speed of testing can be significant for business for many reasons. Precisely in these cases, automation helps save not money but time.

Another reason is to avoid the human errors testing the systems that require extreme accuracy and correctness. The price of such errors can be significantly higher than the cost of automated tests development and maintenance.

When is test automation suitable?

Test automation is appropriate and can be implemented in the following cases:

  • The application functions smoothly
  • The functionality is tested regularly and frequently.

What are the initial data for effectiveness measuring?

To measure the effectiveness of test automation implementation the following input data is required:

  • The cost (in man-hours) of manual testing
  • Autotests development costs (in man-hours)
  • Information about the frequency of testing.

How is the effectiveness evaluated?

Usually, the time period for analysis is a month. But it can be changed according to the project needs. To begin with, calculate the cost of manual testing during each interval.

Then we estimate the cost of automated tests development. Also, it is crucial to take into account the team size. Analyze the difference between the cost of manual testing (without automation) and automated testing.

What can affect the effectiveness of test automation?

  • Frequency of test runs

Supposing that one test is run every day and requires 1 man-hour, the automation of the test takes 4 hours. It is obvious that on the fifth day, autotests will become more effective than manual testing.

  • Data-driven testing

Often one and the same test is needed to perform with a different set of input data or in different environments, e.g. cross-browser testing or creating a single entity with different data.

In this case, test automation with the use of the data-driven approach is the best solution.

  • Tester’s experience

A factor that greatly affects the cost of development is tester’s experience. The tester needs to have enough skills and knowledge to develop, maintain, and analyze automated tests. Otherwise, the time and cost of automation will increase.

  • Tools cost

There is a large number of different tools for test automation. Most of the paid applications are better than their free equivalents and allow developing and debugging tests faster.

  • Analysis and maintenance

While evaluating the effectiveness of test automation, most engineers forget about such important activities like the analysis and support of test runs. If there are a lot of autotests on the project, it may take a long time.

  • Cost of test suits preparation

Often, test automation engineers receive from manual testers test cases that are not suitable for automation. For this reason, sometimes it is necessary to prepare test suits from scratch.

It is obvious that test automation evaluation allows you to answer the following questions:

  • “Should we use automation on the project?”
  • “When will automation bring a significant result?”
  • “How many hours of manual testing can be replaced?”

However, even after receiving the answers to the above-mentioned questions, you should remember that automation can be introduced only when testing processes are stable.

More Posts

Enhancing Agile and DevOps processes
28 February 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
4 actionable tips to enhance Agile and DevOps processes 
Streamlining Agile and DevOps workflows? Learn practical recommendations on how to achieve this.
Agile
General
Test automation
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
15 January 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
Discover topical software testing trends that will shape 2024 and empower companies to smoothly implement advanced technologies.
Agile
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
The year in valuable conversations: recapping 2023 a1qa’s roundtables for IT executives 
8 December 2023,
by a1qa
3 min read
The year in valuable conversations: recapping 2023 a1qa’s roundtables for IT executives 
From dissecting novel industry trends to navigating effective ways of enhancing software quality — let’s recall all a1qa’s roundtables. Join us!
Big data testing
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
General
Interviews
Performance testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
Web app testing
na-st-awards-23
16 November 2023,
by a1qa
3 min read
a1qa shines as the finalist in three categories of the North American Software Testing Awards
a1qa is a triple finalist at the North American Software Testing Awards.
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
3 November 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
From idea to buying: 7 testing types to make your mobile eCommerce solutions flawless
Read the article to discover 7 QA activities helping boost mobile eCommerce solutions quality and provide end users with exceptional buying experiences.
Functional testing
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 2
12 October 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 2
Let’s analyze essential software testing checks to improve the quality of the business-critical Web 3.0 functionality.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 1
11 October 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 1 
In part 1 of this article, learn about the transformation to a new Internet era, Web 3.0, and its benefits for increasing operational efficiency.
General
QA trends
Quality assurance
Software lifecycle QA
Test automation
goodfirms-lists
26 September 2023,
by a1qa
2 min read
a1qa’s recognition by GoodFirms: A testament to our expertise
Delve into a1qa's recent acknowledgment by GoodFirms and explore the significance of this accolade in the sphere of software testing.
General
Performance testing
Test automation
ai-ml-test-automation-mini
21 September 2023,
by a1qa
5 min read
6 activities to supercharge test automation with AI and ML
How to maximize the benefits of test automation? Learn how to do it via applying AI and ML.
Test automation

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.