Blog

QA metrics for managers: defects and developers

When running these metrics pay special attention to the fact how long it took to fix the defect and which step was most intense.
25 October 2013
Quality assurance
The article by Dmitry Tishchenko
Head of global business development at a1qa

In previous articles we discussed, how to define the quality rate, evaluate testers` capacity and covered bug description method. All these things concerned tester`s work, but a tester is the one who detects a bug, while a developer fixes it. So this time I would like to cover some bits of a DEVELOPER`s niche on the QA consulting map. Taking bug statics as a basis, I want to tell about the indexes that reflect developer`s work efficiency.

First one is about defect lifecycle continuity. The index comprises “defect processing period”, “defect fixing period” and some other elements.

When running these metrics pay special attention to the fact how long it took to fix the defect and which step was most intense. Remember to track the index changes and put them in to the diagram, like this one, for example.

Defect lifecycle

The method of data collection resembles the one I described in the first article of QA metrics for managers, when told about defects having status “functions as designed”.

When you start calculating, you`ll see that index increases due to the defect lifecycle longevity. Considerable can be observed on stages like processing, assigning and queuing.

The other one index is the percentage of Rejected bugs. Defect is considered to be rejected, when a tester gives it status of a non-fixed one after checking. That means that a cycle has to be renewed: report to a developer, re-fix, re-check. The time is actually wasted for additional communication. On large scale projects such things cause additional expenditures, which is quite tangible.

Having exercised multiple projects, I noticed that 10% is an acceptable value for the index; try to keep to that limit. It is better to calculate the index after every release, especially on a large scale project, when more than two builds is released per week.

Remember to add the index in every report, to keep the tester and developer teams informed. Doing this you stimulate the team members to bring down the index percentage and define the positive work dynamics.

More Posts

17 June 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Shifting to test automation to maximize software quality
Explore in the article why businesses should move from manual testing to test automation.
Quality assurance
Test automation
RPA in QA
28 May 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Embracing robotic process automation to drive efficiency in QA
Discover how the convergence of robotic process automation helps reshape software testing practices.
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
QA for fintech
7 May 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
Navigating the fintech frontier in 2024: QA’s role in delivering high-quality financial software 
Unveil the future of fintech innovations and learn to refine their quality with the help of software testing.
Blockchain app testing
Cybersecurity testing
Quality assurance
Shift-left testing for better software performance
25 April 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Optimizing software performance with shift-left testing
Still in doubt whether to include performance testing from the initial development stages? Learn the benefits companies obtain with shift-left performance testing.
Performance testing
QA consulting
Quality assurance
Test automation
Telecom trends 2024
15 April 2024,
by a1qa
5 min read
QA’s role in adopting telecom trends for 2024 
Let’s dive into the transformative trends set to redefine the telco industry in 2024 and discover QA strategies to adopt them with precision.
Cloud-based testing
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
General
Migration testing
Performance testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
Zero trust in retail
27 March 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Fortifying retail security posture: embracing zero trust to protect customer data
Why adopt zero trust in the retail sector? How can companies ensure increased resilience to cyber incidents? Find out the answers in this article.
General
Quality assurance
Advancing QA and software testing processes with AI
14 March 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Advancing QA and software testing processes with AI
Uncovering the benefits companies gain when revolutionizing QA practices with the help of AI and tips to implement it.
General
Quality assurance
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 2
30 January 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 2
We continue exploring QA trends, helping businesses remain competitive in 2024.
Cloud-based testing
Cybersecurity testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
15 January 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
Discover topical software testing trends that will shape 2024 and empower companies to smoothly implement advanced technologies.
Agile
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.