Blog

Test model and requirement management

In prior posts, I have discussed test models as a package of test scenarios. Each scenario has specific requirements. The development of software for the telecommunications industry deals with large systems like OSS/BSS, and requirements creation is the initial phase of the project.
11 November 2014
QA consulting
Quality assurance
The article by Julia Ilyushenkova
Head of Telco and Web applications testing department

In prior posts, I have discussed test models as a package of test scenarios. Each scenario has specific requirements. The development of software for the telecommunications industry deals with large systems like OSS/BSS, and requirements creation is the initial phase of the project.

This phase is critical, as requirements errors can result in wasted time and increased cost. Analysis shows that the later readjustment phase can consume 30 to 40 percent of the total effort expended on a software development project.

Researchers have even indicated that about 50 percent of the bugs can be caused by requirements errors; thus, requirements errors may lead to between 70 to 85 percent of all project readjustment costs.

As you can see in Figure 1, the correction of requirements defects can cost up to 110 times more if found in operation than it would if the same defect had been discovered during the requirements definition phase.

Figure 1. Requirements cost to correct a requirement defect depending on when it is discovered. Source: M.P.Singh and Rajnish Vyas

We as QA consultants advise that two main parts of the requirements creation phase should be separated – into requirements development and requirements management.

Figure 2. Difference between requirements development and requirement management.

The requirements development phase aims to collect information, make analysis, review and approve requirement. As a rule, it results in documents package creation. These are documents about image and product borders, software requirement specifications, data vocabulary and a corresponding analysis model.

The review and approval of this package defines the base requirements version (i.e. the agreement between developers and customers). The requirements management stage includes all actions supporting integrity, accuracy and timeliness of renovation of the agreement on requirements during the project.

Management of requirements includes:

  • Management of changes for the base version of requirements;
  • Maintenance of project plans actuality according to changing requirements;
  • Management of versions of separate requirements and the documentation of requirements;
  • Control of a condition of requirements in the base version; and
  • Management of logic connections between separate requirements and other materials with the project.

The best practices and characteristics for requirements management are as follows:

  • Completeness – Each requirement should completely describe the functionality that will be implemented in the software. In other words, it should contain all information necessary for developers to create the fragment of functionality.
  • Correctness – Each requirement should describe the desirable functionality precisely. Connections (links) with sources of requirements is necessary for correctness.
  • Practicability – Possibility to implement each requirement under certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the system and operating environment. Here it is needed to provide interaction of developers with experts in marketing and analysts the ability for extraction of all requirements.
  • Necessity – Each requirement should reflect what is really necessary for users or necessary to meet external system requirements or standards.
  • Setting of priorities – Setting of priorities is necessary to cope effectively with budget reduction, infringement of terms, loss of personnel, or the addition of new requirements in the course of development.
  • Clarity – All readers of requirements should interpret them the same. All special and potentially confusing terms should be provided in a glossary.
  • Verifiability – Requirement management helps to identify the incomplete, not agreed upon, impracticable or ambiguous requirements.

More Posts

Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 2
30 January 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 2
We continue exploring QA trends, helping businesses remain competitive in 2024.
Cloud-based testing
Cybersecurity testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
15 January 2024,
by a1qa
4 min read
Navigating the future: QA trends that will define 2024. Part 1
Discover topical software testing trends that will shape 2024 and empower companies to smoothly implement advanced technologies.
Agile
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
2023-year-end-recap:-a-journey-through-the-a1qa-milestones
20 December 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
2023 year-end recap: a journey through the a1qa milestones 
As we bid farewell to 2023, join us in recalling noteworthy achievements and unforgettable moments that have defined this year!
General
Quality assurance
The year in valuable conversations: recapping 2023 a1qa’s roundtables for IT executives 
8 December 2023,
by a1qa
3 min read
The year in valuable conversations: recapping 2023 a1qa’s roundtables for IT executives 
From dissecting novel industry trends to navigating effective ways of enhancing software quality — let’s recall all a1qa’s roundtables. Join us!
Big data testing
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
General
Interviews
Performance testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
Web app testing
a1qa has been included in the Next-Generation Quality Engineering Services PEAK
29 November 2023,
by a1qa
2 min read
a1qa has been included in the Next-Generation Quality Engineering Services PEAK Matrix® Assessment 2023 by Everest Group
Explore how a1qa secured a proud spot in the prestigious PEAK Matrix® by Everest Group.
General
Quality assurance
na-st-awards-23
16 November 2023,
by a1qa
3 min read
a1qa shines as the finalist in three categories of the North American Software Testing Awards
a1qa is a triple finalist at the North American Software Testing Awards.
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
6 top reasons why business should invest in software quality
9 November 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
6 top reasons why business should invest in software quality
We congratulate you on the World Quality Day with the article by Alina Karachun, Account director at a1qa, having 10+ years of QA expertise. Delve into it to explore the reasons why businesses should prioritize software quality.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
General
Interviews
Performance testing
Quality assurance
3 November 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
From idea to buying: 7 testing types to make your mobile eCommerce solutions flawless
Read the article to discover 7 QA activities helping boost mobile eCommerce solutions quality and provide end users with exceptional buying experiences.
Functional testing
General
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 2
12 October 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
On the way to Web 3.0: key software testing aspects for seamless digital experiences. Part 2
Let’s analyze essential software testing checks to improve the quality of the business-critical Web 3.0 functionality.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.