Blog

Benchmark testing of Raspberry Pi operating systems

The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the Raspberry Pi Foundation to promote studying basic computer science at schools. Raspberry Pi was first introduced as a prototype in late 2011 as a tool to teach and learn programming.
16 September 2014
Quality assurance
Professional headshot of a woman in business attire for QA services team profile
Article by Elena Yakimova
Head of Web Testing Department

The Raspberry Pi is a credit-card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the Raspberry Pi Foundation to promote studying basic computer science at schools. Raspberry Pi was first introduced as a prototype in late 2011 as a tool to teach and learn programming.

Most buyers, once they get their hands on the new RPi, follow the getting started instructions on the Raspberry Pi site running recommended Raspbian proprietary OS. Kano OS is a fork of Raspbian OS, a Debian Linux Distro. It’s an operating system designed for simplicity, speed, and code learning, targeted at new Raspberry Pi users. It dynamically adjusts the Raspberry Pi’s clock-speed when load reaches 100.

Still, there’s a wealth of other operating systems available on the market. But the more alternatives, the harder to choose. Thus, the preferences should be defined and then compared. QA consulting comes to help with this – below, we provide our benchmark on the three operating systems for Raspberry Pi based on our comprehensive testing.

How the benchmark was performed

We selected three Operating Systems Raspbian OS, KANO OS, Pidora OS and conducted different benchmark tests to define how performance characteristics of these operating systems varied.

21 different tests were run, and the results were compared and analysed based on the benchmarks` characteristics.

The following characteristics or measurements were considered:

  • Each test was launched in the same system state.
  • No other functions or applications were active in the system unless the scenario included some activity running in the system.
  • Launched applications used memory even when they were minimized or idle, which could increase probability of garbling the results.
  • The hardware and software used for benchmarking match the production environment.
  • Three identical boards were used with Kano OS Beta 1.0,2 , Pidora 2014 (Raspberry Pi Fedora Remix, version 20) and Raspbian Debian Wheezy (version January 2014) operating systems, installed on SD cards.
  • Benchmarks were launched via commands in Terminal, where real-time activities and results were displayed.

Benchmarks used

Below is a list of all Benchmarks used and the information on successful or failed launch.

Benchmarks comparison table for KANO, PIDORA, and RASPBIAN showing benchmark installation results
Table listing 21 benchmark tools across KANO, PIDORA, and RASPBIAN, using check, cross, and dash icons to show whether each benchmark installed and ran, failed from software incompatibility, or was unsupported by the OS

Final OS benchmark score

Bar chart titled Benchmarks total score: KANO 44, PIDORA 20, RASPBIAN 24
Bar chart titled Benchmarks total score comparing final OS benchmark results for Kano, Pidora, and Raspbian, with scores of 44, 20, and 24 respectively, showing Kano achieved the highest overall benchmark performance in this section

Not all operating systems had success in launching some of the benchmarks and several benchmarks were not objective (PSTree, Top, HardInfo, sysv-rc-conf), so the score can be considered an approximate one.

Overall, Kano OS outperformed Pidora OS and Raspbian OS.
The measurements are approximate and are not 100% scientifically correct. Still, we intended to get a rough idea of how the systems perform. The performance benchmarks and the values shown here were received using particular well-configured and carefully installed systems. All performance benchmark values are provided “AS IS” and no warranties or guarantees are given or implied by a1qa. Actual system performance may vary and is dependent upon many factors including system hardware configuration, software design, and configuration.

Full report with test results data and benchmarks descriptions can be provided upon your request.

More Posts

5 May 2026,
by a1qa
5 min read
How to ensure high software quality that keeps up with Agile speed
Let’s dive into how project teams can combine modern QA practices to ensure that quality keeps pace with rapid development requirements.
Agile
Quality assurance
21 April 2026,
by Automation Lab
5 min read
Modern Selenium Grid alternatives: Playwright, Cypress, and Selenoid in 2026
Teams choosing an automation stack in 2026 need to weigh legacy code, infrastructure load, and the speed of feedback. This article helps them choose between Selenium Grid, Selenoid, Playwright, and Cypress.
Quality assurance
Test automation
17 March 2026,
by Pavel Novik
5 min read
How to build a quality culture that strengthens digital transformation
Quality culture builds trust, improves delivery, and drives transformation success. Keep reading to learn why businesses need to treat quality as a core discipline and how this blog covers everything from vision to training, metrics, and ongoing improvement.
Quality assurance
13 February 2026,
by Elena Yakimova
6 min read
ROI and TCO in QA: How testing helps companies earn more and spend less
Learn how to quantify the true business value of testing and align your quality strategy with the bottom-line goals that matter to the C-suite.
Quality assurance
Test automation
30 January 2026,
by AI Engineering Lab
5 min read
Strategic QA: The foundation of digital transformation
Digital transformation moves fast. Discover how modern QA helps you deliver change at speed by identifying high-stakes risks before they impact your reputation or your bottom line.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Usability testing
19 January 2026,
by AI Engineering Lab
4 min read
Advancing QA and software testing processes with AI
Uncovering the benefits companies gain when revolutionizing QA practices with the help of AI and tips to implement it.
QA in eHealth
Quality assurance
Software lifecycle QA
Test automation
15 December 2025,
by Mike Urbanovich
4 min read
Compatibility testing: how to protect revenue, reputation, and delivery speed
Modern users expect your app to work first time on whatever device they pick up. A clear compatibility strategy helps your team uncover environment-specific defects before launch, cut noisy support tickets, and keep revenue critical journeys running smoothly.
Quality assurance
28 November 2025,
by Pavel Novik
7 min read
Embarking on the journey ahead: QA trend playbook for 2026
Dive into the wave of QA advancements preparing to take center stage in 2026, arming yourself with the foresight you need to navigate any challenges with confidence. 
Blockchain app testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
14 November 2025,
by Pavel Novik
5 min read
QA’s role in a cloud move: before, during, and after
Do not wait until go-live to find bugs. Learn how a continuous QA strategy turns a high-stakes cloud move into a controlled success.

Cloud-based testing
Functional testing
Quality assurance

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.