Blog

Android and IOS security mechanisms. OS vulnerabilities

Everyone knows that Android is an “open” system, which means a user should expect a great number of vulnerabilities in the system. Nevertheless, it is iOS that is considered to be a more vulnerable operating system. According to the research of 2014 the amount of vulnerabilities in all iOS versions reached the number of 335, while in Android system only 36.
17 July 2014
Cybersecurity testing
Mobile app testing
The article by a1qa
a1qa

Everyone knows that Android is an “open” system, which means a user should expect a great number of vulnerabilities in the system. Nevertheless, it is iOS that is considered to be a more vulnerable operating system. According to the research of 2014 the amount of vulnerabilities in all iOS versions reached the number of 335, while in Android system only 36.

From the perspective of mobile app security testing, it is assumed that the number of vulnerabilities in the iOS system would increase, as after the presentation of iOS8 beta-version there appeared new targets for attack: a side keypad, increased number of API-calls new in the innovative SDK and HomeKit system. Still, Apple users should not much worry about security as Apple engineers quickly response to new issues.

Google, in its turn, amplifies the protection mechanisms of operating system. SELinux module integrated in Android 4.4 performs severe access control on the kernel level, while in Android 4.3 SELinux is turned off. This module runs independently from the basic Linux security model.

So, none of the both operating systems wins the “security mechanisms competition”, though Android and Apple have powerful mechanisms to provide protection from the hackers` attacks and pay special attention to OS security.

Above these all, the BYOD tendency rapidly increases its popularity. Though using mobile device for different purposes is a great thing, it is also a great security risk for corporations. Attacking any vulnerable or lost device – a smartphone or a tablet – hackers can get secret documentation and access internal resources like corporate email. As a result, there is a great demand for Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions that allow managing security policy of mobile devices that run in corporate networks.

From the corporations` viewpoint Apple OS has more advantages over Android. There are powerful means for centralized device management in iOS: configuration profiles, remote data reset and incorporated support of outside MDM solutions. Android has no such an opportunity. To integrate with MDM system Android needs downloading a specialized OS.

It is worth mentioning that Samsung corporate security mechanisms left behind lots of Android devices producers. I mean the SAFE (Samsung For Enterprise) program and KNOX suite. They separate all work activities in MDM-system from all others. Thus all Samsung devices operating on Android 4.3 and higher versions fully comply with corporate security principles. Comparing with Android running devices, Apple has a smaller range of products and can easily provide support for corporate security systems for all versions of its smartphones, tablets and OSs. In this case the winner is iOS.

The topic of the security mechanisms of both operating systems deserves, I guess, a series of articles, this was just an overview. Those who want to have more profound information about Android and Apple security mechanisms can read detailed manuals on the companies` websites.

I would like to resume pros & cons of the OSs from the security viewpoint:

Android

Pros

  • “Open” for security research
  • Applications are immune to buffer overloads
  • Severe access control on the kernel level

Cons

  • Lots potentially harmful software in Google Play
  • Poor corporate security opportunities
  • Great number of OS versions and device models, which complicates the security methods standardization

iOS

Pros

  • Control of downloaded applications in App Store
  • Quick response to the security issues
  • Opportunities to support corporate security systems

Cons

  • Lots of vulnerabilities in the operating system
  • Increase of potential targets for attacks

To cut the long story short, I want to say that today very few people choose a smartphone because of high security protection. And that`s not a mistake, as Android and iOS are similar in their security approach. Still, if the device security is really essential for you, choose any Apple device or something by Samsung operating on Android 4.3 version and higher ones.

More Posts

gaming-qa
24 August 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
Ready, steady, test: How QA drives seamless gaming experiences
Why is QA pivotal for delivering unmatched player experiences? How to level up video game quality? Find the answers in the article.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Localization testing
Performance testing
Quality assurance
Test automation
Usability testing
12jun202311
22 June 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
The ins and outs of ensuring OSS/BSS software quality: a hands-on guide
The need for OSS/BSS’ flawless operation is undisputable, but how can we reach that goal? Inter alia, a1qa suggests focusing on delivering high software quality to the end users.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
General
Performance testing
6-march-2023-1
21 March 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
The ultimate QA guide for smoothly migrating to Web 3.0
Find out how businesses can seamlessly migrate to Web 3.0 by relying on quality assurance.
Cybersecurity testing
General
Performance testing
Usability testing
27 February 2023,
by a1qa
5 min read
Reaching HIPAA compliance for eHealth solutions through QA
We reveal HIPAA’s data safety benchmarks and shed light on how software testing may help in its conformity.
Cybersecurity testing
Software lifecycle QA
Mobile app testing
15 February 2023,
by a1qa
4 min read
Mobile app testing guide: win the race with five-star software
Which aspects of mobile apps to test first to produce a really high-quality product? Find the answer to this and other questions related to mobile app testing in the article.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Mobile app testing
Performance testing
Test automation
Usability testing
qa-trends-in-telecom
30 September 2022,
by a1qa
5 min read
4 telecom trends for 2023 and how to painlessly implement them with QA
It’s time to explore the telecom trends for the upcoming year. Let’s look at them together and also see the value that QA brings for their smooth deployment.
Cybersecurity testing
Migration testing
QA trends
Quality assurance
Test automation
black-friday
29 July 2022,
by a1qa
4 min read
Get ready for Black-Friday-to-Cyber-Monday shopping: 5 testing types to include in your QA strategy
What’s your nightmare during Black Friday and Cyber Monday shopping? If it’s a loss of sales, read about the ways to prevent this in the article.
Cybersecurity testing
Functional testing
Localization testing
Performance testing
Usability testing
eLearning and mLearning QA_mini
22 July 2022,
by a1qa
4 min read
6 must-have testing types for eLearning and mLearning software
Discover how to ensure top-notch educational solutions through QA, provide end users with boosted studying experience, and make the grade in the IT market.
General
Localization testing
Mobile app testing
Performance testing
30 June 2022,
by a1qa
4 min read
App software testing for telecom: What are the common issues telco providers face?
Facing problems with the quality of your telecom software products? Read more in the article and find out the ways to address them.
Cybersecurity testing
Performance testing
Test automation

Get in touch

Please fill in the required field.
Email address seems invalid.
Please fill in the required field.
We use cookies on our website to improve its functionality and to enhance your user experience. We also use cookies for analytics. If you continue to browse this website, we will assume you agree that we can place cookies on your device. For more details, please read our Privacy and Cookies Policy.